Featured Post
Innovation in Cosmetic Industry Free Essays
string(177) additionally perceive the current speculation that organizations are best in the event that they have different item ideas in t...
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Australia And Apec Essays - International Trade, Free Essays
Australia And Apec Essays - International Trade, Free Essays    Australia And Apec      Economics assignment: APEC  When the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) was established in 1989 in response to the   growing interdependence among Asia-Pacific economies, its goal was to advance Asia-Pacific economic   dynamism and sense of community. When the cooperation was established, there were 12 founding   member economies, namely Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea,   Malaysia, New Zealand, Republic of the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and the United States. Since then   there has been more countries/economies joining APEC. APEC has come a long way since 1989. It has   built steadily on the efforts of the past and looks forward to further positive progress. The initial years of   APEC were focused largely on exchange of views and project based initiatives. As needs of the member   economies has evolved into a forum of higher purpose: to build the Asia-Pacific community through   achieving economic growth and development through trade and economic cooperation. In the Osaka   meeting in 1994, APEC leaders adopted the Osaka Action Agenda, which firmly established three pillars of   APEC activities: Trade and investment liberalization, business facilitation and economic-technical   cooperation. Its main objective is to develop a region-wide, free trade and investment regime by the year   2000. APEC operates by consensus. In 1991, members committed themselves to conducting their activities   and work programs on the basis of open dialogue with equal respect for the views of all participants.  The APEC chair, which rotates annually among members, is responsible for hosting the annual ministerial   meeting of foreign and economic ministers. At the 1989 Canberra Ministerial Meeting, it was agreed that it   would be appropriate that every alternative ministerial meeting be held in an ASEAN economy/country.   Senior Official Meeting (SOM) are held regularly prior to every ministerial meeting. APEC senior officials   make recommendations to the ministers and carry out their decisions. They oversee and coordinate, with   approval from Ministers, the budgets and work programs of the APEC for a.  Mr. Fischer, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade, said Australias IAP (Individual Action Plan)   would address the main trade liberalization issues of tariffs, non- tariffs, investment and services, although   the 1996 IAP would not pre-judge the outcomes of the existing and previously announced reviews into the   passenger motor vehicle, textile clothing and footwear and sugar sectors. Other elements of the IAP deal   wit the important trade facilitation issues such as standards and customs procedures, intellectual property   rights, competition policy, and mobility of business people and deregulation.   Australias plan is fully consistent with the general principals of the Osaka Action Agenda agreed by that   leaders in November 1995, including comprehensives, Mr. Fischer said. Australias done a great deal to   liberalize our market consistent with APEC goals, and we expect others to match our record. The   government will pursue vigorously Australian trade and investment priorities within APEC, Mr. Fischer   stated.  Australias IAP address the objectives and guidelines of the Osaka Action Plan in a comprehensive manner:  Tariffs  Australias IAP includes reduction in applied tariffs to the year 2000.  Table: Tariff Reductions in the APEC region  Simple Average Applied Tariff  1988 1993 1997  Australia * 15.6 7.0 5.3  Brunei 3.9 3.9 2.0  Canada (*) 3.7 2.4 1.3^  Chile 19.9 11 11  China 39.5 37.5 17  Hong Kong 0 0 0  Indonesia 18.1 17 11.7  Japan * 4.3 3.4 4.6  Korea 19.2 11.6 7.9^  Malaysia 13.6 12.8 7.8^  Mexico * 10.5 12.6 9.8^  New Zealand 14.9 8.5 5.2  PNG NA NA 23^  Philippines 27.9 23.5 12.1  Singapore 0.3 0.4 0  Chinese Taipei 12.6 8.9 8.6  Thailand 31.2 37.8 17  United States (*) 4.2 4.2 3.4^  Note: Does not include calculation of non-ad valorum tariffs   Indicates trade-weighted advantage   ^1996 data  Source: aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1998-99/c99cib05.htm  Australias applied simple tariff has fallen from 15.6% in 1998 to 6.1% in 1996 and will reduce further to   4.5% by the year 2000. Australia is also hoping to have tariffs reduced to zero in numerous sectors of our   economy by the year 2000.  Sectors Selected for Early Voluntary Sectoral Liberalism   Sector EVSL Proposal  Toys Progressive reduction to zero of tariffs on toys, preferably by 2000. Elimination of unjustified non-tariff barriers. Economic and technical cooperation  Gems and jewelry Elimination of trade-restrictive measures on these products (phased out by 2005), which include pearls, diamonds, silver, gold, platinum, jewelry, goldsmiths and silversmiths wares.  Environmental Goods and Services Elimination of tariffs by 2003 on environmental goods and liberalization of environmental services. Work on non-tariffs barriers. Economic and technical cooperation.  Food Further impetus to trade    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.