Study Two University at the Same Time Essay Example for Free

Study Two University at the Same Time Essay Since study only one university is not attractive anymore, because it is too simple and provides less benefit too. So these day, almost all undergraduate students or just graduated from high school are ambitious by choose to attend two universities at the same time, because they think they could hold two bachelor degrees at the same time after they graduate. In hindrance, this may not provides any benefit but just bad influences to their health, time, education and money. Especially, it would provides them â€Å"Stress†, that could badly affects their study. Moreover, participating in two colleges at the same time will face health issue, because most students will not eat punctually as they used to, and sometimes they might have ate some unhealthy food or fast food or could be junk food outside, that could cause them a serious health problem. Theoretically, students would face up to busy and critically hard assignments from both universities. Unfortunately, sometimes the deadline of the assignments might be the same, and for sure, that will make them feel stress and couldn’t pay attention or absorb the education well during class. In brief, taking two universities at the same time is not an option for those who are unhealthy and unable to manage their time probably. But if they are stubborn and really want to participate in it, they should balanced it equally beforehand.

Extreme Advertising: Go Big or Go Home :: BTEC Business Marketing GCSE Coursework

Extreme Advertising: Go Big or Go Home This Maxim climbing gear ad is an example of using both aggressive language and images to promote climbing as an extreme sport. North Face uses this image in their web page. If you wear North Face gear, you too can take your ice axes and back-counrty skis into the Tibetan wilderness. Adidas uses this image in their trail running ads. The caption in the image reads "Runners. Yeah, We're Different." It invites people to relate to some of the more intimate details of a separate subculture. Intro Advertisements of outdoor gear tell us we live in an extreme world today. No longer do we go out mountain biking or skiing, they tell us. We need to go big, risking our lives to promote an image of ourselves as one who can push the edge of the envelope by extreme mountain biking and extreme skiing. NorthFace, a high-end outdoor clothing company started this language in the 1970s in its advertising of ski apparel. Now, most every sport has gone extreme. To advertise this new image, companies have attempted to use a variety of techniques that separate themselves from the rest of the crowd. They include: --Creating an Extreme Image to a Wide-Based Consumer Audience: Boulder Gear and North Face. --Advertising to a Young, Aggressive Group Obsessed with Speed: Manastash and an ad inside APEX Magazine --Creating an Insider Feeling of the Extreme...with a Dash of Playfulness: Nike and Adidas Extremism as an image has come to include outdoor activities such as kayaking, skiing, climbing, mountain biking, windsurfing and a host of other mainstream outdoor activities. It has also brought about a variety of subcategories as well. Sky diving now has six new disciplines, including sky surfing, free flying and free style-an aerial ballet. There à ­s even an extreme version of the extreme sport of sky diving called BASE jumping (BASE=Bridge, Aerial, Structure, Earth) in which participants jump from low-lying structures and open their chute with only seconds separating them between an extreme experience and death (Heath 1997: p4). Sports are not the only aspect of extreme though. The language has seeped into our everyday vocabulary to the point that we can not do anything without having the possibility of doing it extreme. Bill Gates speaks of extreme programming, and there à ­s extreme golf in which participants play golf around unused summer ski resorts. Books of extreme adve nture have been popularized by John Krauker's Into Thin Air.

Forrest Gump Review Essay

The third movie we watched was, â€Å"Forrest Gump†. Tom Hanks plays the main character, a simple man called Forrest Gump. The story is told through his innocent eyes, and we see just how crazy the world really is. His best friend, Jenny, is played by Robin Wright and Forrest’s mother is played by Sally Field. There are a few themes to be found in this movie, the main ones being, love, death and war. You can find love in the movie between Forrest and Jenny being best friends, and how Forrest took care and looked after Jenny in her time of need. Also there is a strong love between Forrest and his mother, and how she took care of him when he was younger and how later he took care of her when she was sick. Finally you can find love between Forrest and his new friend, Bubba that he meets along his journey, and how close they are and the plans they make. Death can be found in a few places in the movie, being it his mother, his wife, or his best friend; we see how Forrest overcomes these deaths and how innocent he is when it comes to death itself. The third theme, war, is found when Forrest finds himself working for the army in Vietnam. We see here that he sees the world as a crazy place and even though he is seen as simple, he sees that fighting isn’t the only way to solve things. This movie shows that no matter how simple people see you to be, you still know the difference between right and wrong. Forrest sees the world in a more innocent and sweet way, and as the movie goes on people start to see the world the way he does and start to understand him a little bit more.

In Venkatesh Memoir Gang - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1593 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/04/04 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Gang Violence Essay Did you like this example? Sudhir Venkatesh, unlike his professors and classmates took the Chicago urban streets head on. Despite having a detailed map of areas to avoid by the university, this didnt stop the curious mind Venkatesh of exploring the city streets of Chicago and talking to locals in the area. Venkatesh did state he had an interest in the poor black community, so he would focus his time and energy, talking, reading and questioning anything that involved the black community. Being from a suburban area in California, Venkatesh was not exposed to the urban streets of Chicago, so walking the streets he had no fear and always wondered by the University restricted certain areas when he never witnessed no crime. Venkatesh was studying Sociology in Graduate School and while he like many of the questions that was being proposed in his seminar classes, he disliked the how sociologist had no real connections with people. He felt surveys didnt capture the true vibrant life of Chicago. As Venkatesh states, I found it particularly curious that most of these researchers didnt seem interested in meeting the people they wrote about.Pg 3 Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "In Venkatesh Memoir Gang" essay for you Create order In Venkatesh memoir Gang leader for a Day, he is labeled as a rogue sociologist, but he is anything away from a rogue researcher. He is a prime example who what a Sociologist should be doing. But what Venkatesh did is far from new since ethnographies does have many advantages. Qualitative research allows for one to expose their mind to those they wish to study. Sometimes sociologist forget the people aspect or sociology and just focus on numbers. According to Merriam dictionary, Sociology is the science of society, social institutions, and social relationships. Cant study social relationships without interacting with people One advantage that qualitative research has is overt participant observation. Since Venkatesh had South East ethic background in was easy for him to blend in to his environment because he passed for Hispanic and on occasion Arabic despite being of Indian heritage. Since He was a person of color people were willing to talk to him and had a little more trust in him as opposed if he was a white man conducting the same interview. During this study we learned this one gang operated like a cooperate company with the low level employees being the grunts on the gang to the Board of Directors, just like in a big company made the most money and also made decisions how the gang is going to operate. Another advantage of this type of research is that it allows you to know the participants on a more personal level. Allows you to understand the behavior, characters and other human traits that quantitative research cant duplicate. As a grad student Venkatesh didnt have a lot money to do mass surveys or research, so one benefit he had on his side was researching a smaller sample size. Being that the gang and area he was researching was local to him, it saved him a lot of money by staying local. Also J.T would also pick him saving traveling cost. Also as a grad student Venkatesh had time and was extremely flexible to the gangs time allowing him to draw a lot of data from the participants. One of three disadvantages of qualitative research is that it is highly subjective. While Venkatesh did get a lot of insight on gang life and how the Black Kings operate in Chicago, one can argue that J.T only exposed information where it deemed fit and only showed one side of the gang life and not in its in its entirely. J.T uses Venkatesh believing he is going to write a biograph on him and Venkayesh uses. J.T to get exposure into the gang life and understand how the economy works in the gang culture. Since J.T. believes he is getting a book written about him, it is easy for to lie and misrepresent a lot of facts about how he operates his gang. Being qualitative research is subjective you would have to cross reference your study with similar studies like yours to find what is similar. Another disadvantage is the possibility is going Native. The term going native refers to the danger for ethnographers to become too involved in the community under study, thus losing objectivity and distance. Usually in most qualitative research there is a fine line between obserserver and percipient. But in Gang leader for a day it we can see were Vankatesh begins to act like the parcipants around him. He spent 10 years with the gang, so it can become easy to forget ones role in research. While he never got hurt or committed any serious crime such gun violence or killing anyone, spending 10 years with one group can cause one to sometimes lose sight on what you are researching. Also since many participants in gang leader for a day knew they were being observed, it can be easy for many to change their behavior or show lack of behavior due to being watched. This is known as The observer effect. One example of this is J.T. He knew Venkatesh was doing research, but changed his behavior believing Venkatesh would write a biography on him and not actual field research on project life. When people conduct research, normally is to understand a problem and possible use to the information to pass policy to help those who need it most. But in Gang leader for a day, no one benefited from the research but Venkatesh who in a way played everyone to get a Degree from an Ivy league school while one a fellowship. While Venkatesh can wake up free of any obligations or any commitments to anyone, J.T on the other hand cant. Also Venlatesh started his research early without knowing what he was studying, so therefore he had no department approval to conduct the research he was doing. In the case for Gang leader for a Day, one ethical issue that is unique to qualitive research is confidilatiy. Since Venkatesh was interacting with gang members on a daily basis, Venkatesh was exposed to a lot of illegal activities that had no protection under qualitative research. Venkatesh learned that many of the gang members earned extra money from different activitya ranging from baby-sitting, carpentry, fixing cars in alleys to sex work. The two individuals with most authority in this situation were J.T. the gang leader and Ms. Bailey who was the building manager who turned a blind eye to the gangs activities in return for payments and protection. Both of these individuals had given their blessing to the research project and found individuals for Venkatesh to interview. They were interested in the research and Venkatesh told them what he had found out about individuals side businesses. This was a problem because he has promised confidentiality to the people he was researching and there was the problem with both J.T and Ms Bailey who are on top would use this information to bully people into giving up extra money. Many of the participants in Gang leader for a day had no idea about the scopes of confidentiality and how confidentiality in qualitative research is different from a Doctor, patient or a lawyer, client confidentiality. In cases where it involves crimes, I believe it is best to disclose the scopes what is protected and what is not from the moment you meet the participants. Being upfront about what is protected allows the participant to make inform decisions on what they choose to share to and around you. Also some of the names in Gang leader for a day were not changed, thus endangering the lives of those individuals. While I have no interest of being a qualitative researcher in the traditional sense, I believe not being gullible and native is what I can take away from reading this book. While Venkatesh did have an open mind and was interested in learning about the black community, his ignorance of street life did almost get him killed. If it was not for J.T being a former college student himself, Venkatesh could have died being so bold just to walk in random buildings expecting people to nicely talk to him about a survey about being black and poor. Being that prior to J.t. encounter, he believed since he has never witness a crime or his conversations with the middle aged black men in the park, he was free to randomly explore the projects without an understanding of how gang life works., such as the street language, gang colors, gang talk and what gangs are in the area. To be an affective researcher I believe in scoping the area you wish to research at and being observant of the area. Go for walks in the area and shop in the area to get a feel of who and what is around you. Listen to how people talk to each other. Get to know the norms from observing the area. The more you study and area before you actually study your actually audience, the more likely you can get yourself out of trouble. Also to make the research a much easy ride to do is to know your objective. Knowing what you are looking makes you focus on that task as to oppose to looking around hoping it comes around. Maybe why Venkatesh stood as long as he did researching is because from the beginning he had no real objective to what he truly wanted to study.